\begin{document}$ ^{93{\mathrm{m}}} {\mathrm{Mo}} $\end{document} is an ideal candidate for NEEC measurements. It is an isomeric state with an excitation energy of 2.4 MeV, a spin-parity of \begin{document}$21/2 ^+ $\end{document}, and a half-life of 6.85 h. In addition, there is an energy level with a spin-parity of \begin{document}$17/2 ^+ $\end{document} and half-life of 3.5 ns; its excitation energy is 4.8-keV higher than that of \begin{document}$ ^{93{\mathrm{m}}} {\mathrm{Mo}} $\end{document} and primarily de-excites to the \begin{document}$ 13/2^+ $\end{document} state through a 268-keV gamma ray. This level is referred to as the triggering level in the NEEC process. Once excited to the triggering level, the nucleus decays immediately to the ground state, releasing energy of about 2.4 MeV.In 2018, Chiara et al. reported the first experimental observation of \begin{document}$ ^{93{\mathrm{m}}} {\mathrm{Mo}} $\end{document} isomer depletion with a probability of 1.0(3)%, which was attributed to the NEEC mechanism. However, the following theoretical calculations fail to reproduce such a high probability. In 2022, another experiment was devoted to measuring the depletion of \begin{document}$ ^{93{\mathrm{m}}} {\mathrm{Mo}} $\end{document} in the stopping process. The measurements were performed at the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou. However, no characteristic 268-keV transition caused by isomer depletion was observed, and it was inferred that the upper limit of the excitation probability was about \begin{document}$2\times 10^{-5} $\end{document}, which is different from the previously reported value of 1%. The beam energy in the Lanzhou experiment is lower than that of the previous data, which can lead to different depletion probabilities. Thus, further experiments are required to clarify this issue.In this study, two experiments related to NEEC are conducted, the reliability of the experimental results is evaluated from a new perspective of error analysis, and a design scheme is provided for implementing further experiments. According to the proposed experimental setup, the recoil energy is considerably increased and particle-identification devices are added. The detectors for particle identification can cause energy loss, thus the increasing of the recoil energy is also a prerequisite for particle identification. Considering the recoil energy, production cross-section, and the population of high-spin states that can decay to\begin{document}$ ^{93{\mathrm{m}}} {\mathrm{Mo}} $\end{document}, we recommend the \begin{document}$ ^{94}{\mathrm{Zr}}+ ^{4}{\mathrm{He }}$\end{document} as the beam-target candidate for future experiments based on the secondary beam line. In addition, a simple design for particle identification is also introduced in this study."> - 必威体育下载

Search

Article

x

留言板

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

downloadPDF
Citation:

    Jia Chen-Xu, Ding Bing, Hua Wei, Guo Song, Qiang Yun-Hua, Chen Hong-Xing, Wei Rui, Zhou Xiao-Hong
    PDF
    HTML
    Get Citation
    Metrics
    • Abstract views:725
    • PDF Downloads:22
    • Cited By:0
    Publishing process
    • Received Date:19 February 2024
    • Accepted Date:03 May 2024
    • Available Online:30 May 2024
    • Published Online:05 July 2024

      返回文章
      返回
        Baidu
        map