- 必威体育下载

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Abstract

Spin qubits in silicon-based semiconductor quantum dots have become one of the prominent candidates for realizing fault-tolerant quantum computing due to their long coherence time, good controllability, and compatibility with modern advanced integrated circuit manufacturing processes. In recent years, due to the remarkable advances in silicon-based materials, the structure of quantum dot and its fabrication process, and qubit manipulation technology, the great progress of high-fidelity state preparation and readout, single- and two-qubit gates of spin qubits for silicon based semiconductor quantum computation has been achieved. The control fidelities for single- and two-qubit gates all exceed 99%—fault tolerance threshold required by the surface code known for its exceptionally high tolerance to errors. In this paper, we briefly introduce the basic concepts of silicon-based semiconductor quantum dots, discuss the state-of-art technologies used to improve the fidelities of single- and two-qubit gates, and finally highlight the research directions that should be focused on. This paper is organized as follows. Firstly, we introduce three major types of quantum dot (QD) devices fabricated on different silicon-based substrates, including Si/SiGe heterojunction and Si/SiO ₂. The spin degree of electron or nucleus hosted in QD can be encoded into spin qubits. Electron spin qubits can be thermally initialized to ground state by using an electron reservoirs, and can be read out by spin-charge conversion mechanism: energy-selective readout (Elzerman readout) with reservoirs or Pauli spin blockade (PSB) without reservoirs. Additionally, high fidelity single-shot readout has been demonstrated by using radio-frequency gate reflectometry combined with the PSB, which has unique advantages in large-scale qubit array. To coherently control the spin qubits, electron dipole resonance (ESR) or electron dipole spin resonance (EDSR) for electron and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for nucleus are introduced. With the help of isotope purification greatly improving the dephasing time of qubit and fast single-qubit manipulation based on EDSR, fidelity above 99.9% can be reached. For the two-qubit gates based on exchange interaction between electron spins, the strength of interaction $ J $ combined with Zeeman energy difference $ \Delta {E}_{z} $ determines the energy levels of system, which lead to the different two-qubit gates, such as controlled-Z (CZ), controlled-Rotation (CROT), and the square root of the SWAP gate ( $ \sqrt{\rm{S}\rm{W}\rm{A}\rm{P}} $ ) gates. In order to improve the fidelity of two-qubit gates, a series of key technologies is used experimentally, they being isotope purification, symmetry operation, careful Hamiltonian engineering, and gate set tomography. Fidelity of two-qubit gates exceeding 99% has been demonstrated for electron spin qubits in Si/SiGe quantum dots and nuclear spin qubits in donors. These advances have pushed the silicon-based spin qubit platform to become a major stepping stone towards fault-tolerant quantum computation. Finally, we discuss the future study of spin qubits, that is, how to effectively expand the number of qubits, and many other problems to be explored and solved.

Keywords:

quantum computing/
silicon-based semiconductor quantum dot/
spin qubit/
logic gate/
fidelity

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author:Guo Guo-Ping,gpguo@ustc.edu.cn

FullText HTML: translate this paragraph

References

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]

Cited By

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]

[1]	Jiang Da, Yu Dong-Yang, Zheng Zhan, Cao Xiao-Chao, Lin Qiang, Liu Wu-Ming.Research progress of material, physics, and device of topological superconductors for quantum computing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(16): 160302.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220596
[2]	Wang Mei-Hong, Hao Shu-Hong, Qin Zhong-Zhong, Su Xiao-Long.Research advances in continuous-variable quantum computation and quantum error correction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(16): 160305.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220635
[3]	Wang Chen-Xu, He Ran, Li Rui-Rui, Chen Yan, Fang Ding, Cui Jin-Ming, Huang Yun-Feng, Li Chuan-Feng, Guo Guang-Can.Advances in the study of ion trap structures in quantum computation and simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(13): 133701.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220224
[4]	Zhou Zong-Quan.“Quantum memory” quantum computers and noiseless phton echoes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 070305.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20212245
[5]	Zhang Jie-Yin, Gao Fei, Zhang Jian-Jun.Research progress of silicon and germanium quantum computing materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(21): 217802.doi:10.7498/aps.70.20211492
[6]	Zhang Shi-Hao, Zhang Xiang-Dong, Li Lü-Zhou.Research progress of measurement-based quantum computation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(21): 210301.doi:10.7498/aps.70.20210923
[7]	He Ying-Ping, Hong Jian-Song, Liu Xiong-Jun.Non-abelian statistics of Majorana modes and the applications to topological quantum computation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(11): 110302.doi:10.7498/aps.69.20200812
[8]	Zhao Shi-Ping, Liu Yu-Xi, Zheng Dong-Ning.Novel superconducting qubits and quantum physics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(22): 228501.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180845
[9]	Fan Heng.Quantum computation and quantum simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(12): 120301.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180710
[10]	Pan Jian, Yu Qi, Peng Xin-Hua.Experimental technique for multi-qubit nuclear magnetic resonance system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(15): 150302.doi:10.7498/aps.66.150302
[11]	Jia Fang, Liu Cun-Jin, Hu Yin-Quan, Fan Hong-Yi.New formula for calculating the fidelity of teleportation and its applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(22): 220302.doi:10.7498/aps.65.220302
[12]	Yang Guang, Lian Bao-Wang, Nie Min.Fidelity recovery scheme for quantum teleportation in amplitude damping channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(1): 010303.doi:10.7498/aps.64.010303
[13]	Zhao Na, Liu Jian-She, Li Tie-Fu, Chen Wei.Progress of coupled superconducting qubits. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(1): 010301.doi:10.7498/aps.62.010301
[14]	Nie Min, Zhang Lin, Liu Xiao-Hui.Poisson survival model of quantum entanglement signaling network and fidelity analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 230303.doi:10.7498/aps.62.230303
[15]	Zhao Jian-Hui.Ground state phase diagram of the quantum spin 1 Blume-Capel model: reduced density fidelity study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 220501.doi:10.7498/aps.61.220501
[16]	Fang Mao-Fa, Peng Xiao-Fang, Liao Xiang-Ping, Pan Chang-Ning, Fang Jian-Shu.Fidelity of quantum teleportation of atomic-state in dissipative environment. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(9): 090303.doi:10.7498/aps.60.090303
[17]	Ye Bin, Xu Wen-Bo, Gu Bin-Jie.Robust quantum computation of the quantum kicked Harper model and dissipative decoherence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(2): 689-695.doi:10.7498/aps.57.689
[18]	Xia Yun-Jie, Wang Guang-Hui, Du Shao-Jiang.Fidelity of the scheme of continunous variables quantum teleportation via minimum-correlation mixed quantum states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(8): 4331-4336.doi:10.7498/aps.56.4331
[19]	Zhang Deng-Yu, Guo Ping, Gao Feng.Fidelity of two-level atoms’ quantum states in a strong thermal radiation field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 1906-1910.doi:10.7498/aps.56.1906
[20]	Ye Bin, Gu Rui-Jun, Xu Wen-Bo.Robust quantum computation of the kicked Harper model and quantum chaos. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(7): 3709-3718.doi:10.7498/aps.56.3709

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 23 - 2022-12-05

Metrics

Abstract views:7027
PDF Downloads:424
Cited By:0

Search

Article