- 必威体育下载

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Abstract

The introduction of non-Hermiticity into traditional Hermitian quantum systems generalizes their basic notions and brings about many novel phenomena, e.g., the non-Hermitian skin effect that is exclusive to non-Hermitian systems, attracting enormous attention from almost all branches of physics. Contrary to the quantum platforms, classical systems have the advantages of low cost and mature techniques under room temperature. Among them, the classical electrical circuits are more flexible on simulating quantum tight-binding models in principle with any range of hopping under any boundary conditions in any dimension, and have become a powerful platform for the simulation of quantum matters. In this paper, by constructing an electrical circuit, we simulate by SPICE the static properties of a prototypical non-Hermitian model—the nonreciprocal Aubry-André (AA) model that has the nonreciprocal hopping and on-site quasiperiodic potentials. The paper is organized as follows: Following the introduction, in Sec. II we review in detail the Laplacian formalism of electrical circuits and the mapping to the quantum tight-binding model. Then, in Sec. III, an electrical circuit is proposed with resistors, capacitors, inductors, and the negative impedance converters with current inversion (INICs), establishing a mapping between the circuit's Laplacian and the non-reciprocal AA model's Hamiltonian under periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) or open boundary conditions (OBCs). Especially, the nonreciprocity, the key of this model, is realized by INICs. In Sec IV, based on the mapping, for the proposed circuit under PBCs, we reconstruct the circuit's Laplacian via SPICE by measuring voltage responses of an AC current input at each node. The complex spectrum and its winding number $\nu$ can be calculated by the measured Laplacian, which are consistent with the theoretical prediction, showing $\nu=\pm 1$ for non-Hermitian topological regimes with complex eigenenergies and extended eigenstates, and $\nu=0$ for topologically trivial regimes with real eigenenergies and localized eigenstates. In Sec V, for the circuit under OBCs, a similar method is used for measuring the node distribution of voltage response, which simulates the competition of non-Hermitian skin effects and the Anderson localization, depending on the strength of quasiperiodic potentials; the phase transition points also appear in the inverse participation ratios of voltage responses. During the design process, the parameters of auxiliary resistors and capacitors are evaluated for obtaining stable responses, because the complex eigenfrequecies of the circuits are inevitable under PBCs. Our detailed scheme can directly instruct further potential experiments, and the designing method of the electrical circuit is universal and can in principle be applied to the simulation for other quantum tight-binding models.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Cheng En-Hong¹,
Lang Li-Jun^1,2

Corresponding author:Lang Li-Jun,ljlang@scnu.edu.cn

Funds:Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11904109) and the Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2019A1515111101)

FullText HTML: translate this paragraph

References

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]

Cited By

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]

[1]	Yang Yan-Li, Duan Zhi-Lei, Xue Hai-Bin.Edge states and skin effect dependent electron transport properties of non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(24): 247301.doi:10.7498/aps.72.20231286
[2]	Xu Can-Hong, Xu Zhi-Cong, Zhou Zi-Yu, Cheng En-Hong, Lang Li-Jun.Electrical circuit simulation of non-Hermitian lattice models. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 200301.doi:10.7498/aps.72.20230914
[3]	Xu Da, Wang Yi-Pu, Li Tie-Fu, You Jian-Qiang.Coherent coupling in a driven qubit-magnon hybrid quantum system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(15): 150302.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220260
[4]	Wang Chen-Xu, He Ran, Li Rui-Rui, Chen Yan, Fang Ding, Cui Jin-Ming, Huang Yun-Feng, Li Chuan-Feng, Guo Guang-Can.Advances in the study of ion trap structures in quantum computation and simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(13): 133701.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220224
[5]	Luo Yu-Chen, Li Xiao-Peng.Quantum simulation of interacting fermions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 226701.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221756
[6]	Chen Yang, Zhang Tian-Yang, Guo Guang-Can, Ren Xi-Feng.Research progress of integrated photonic quantum simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(24): 244207.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221938
[7]	Hou Bo, Zeng Qi-Bo.Non-Hermitian mosaic dimerized lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(13): 130302.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220890
[8]	Liu Jia-Lin, Pang Ting-Fang, Yang Xiao-Sen, Wang Zheng-Ling.Skin effect in disordered non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 227402.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221151
[9]	Gao Xue-Er, Li Dai-Li, Liu Zhi-Hang, Zheng Chao.Recent progress of quantum simulation of non-Hermitian systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(24): 240303.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221825
[10]	Chen Shu-Yue, Jiang Chuang, Ke Shao-Lin, Wang Bing, Lu Pei-Xiang.Suppression of non-Hermitian skin effect via Aharonov-Bohm cage. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(17): 174201.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220978
[11]	Deng Tian-Shu.Non-Hermitian skin effect in a domain-wall system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(17): 170306.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221087
[12]	Lin Jian, Ye Meng, Zhu Jia-Wei, Li Xiao-Peng.Machine learning assisted quantum adiabatic algorithm design. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 140306.doi:10.7498/aps.70.20210831
[13]	Hu Yu-Min, Song Fei, Wang Zhong.Generalized Brillouin zone and non-Hermitian band theory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 230307.doi:10.7498/aps.70.20211908
[14]	Sun Kong-Hao, Yi Wei.Dynamics of non-Hermitian local topological marker. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 230309.doi:10.7498/aps.70.20211576
[15]	Zhu Yan-Qing, Zhang Dan-Wei, Zhu Shi-Liang.Simulating Dirac, Weyl and Maxwell equations with cold atoms in optical lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(4): 046701.doi:10.7498/aps.68.20181929
[16]	Kong Xiang-Yu, Zhu Yuan-Ye, Wen Jing-Wei, Xin Tao, Li Ke-Ren, Long Gui-Lu.New research progress of nuclear magnetic resonance quantum information processing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(22): 220301.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180754
[17]	Zhao Shi-Ping, Liu Yu-Xi, Zheng Dong-Ning.Novel superconducting qubits and quantum physics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(22): 228501.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180845
[18]	Fan Heng.Quantum computation and quantum simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(12): 120301.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180710
[19]	Yu Xiang-Min, Tan Xin-Sheng, Yu Hai-Feng, Yu Yang.Topological quantum material simulated with superconducting quantum circuits. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(22): 220302.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20181857
[20]	Li Shao-Hua, Yang Zhen-Jun, Lu Da-Quan, Hu Wei.Numerical study of Hermite-Gaussian beams in nonlocal thermal media. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(2): 024214.doi:10.7498/aps.60.024214

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 16 - 2022-08-20

Metrics

Abstract views:5461
PDF Downloads:300
Cited By:0

Search

Article