\begin{document}$ ({m}^{2}+m+1)N-1 $\end{document} points instead of \begin{document}$ {m}^{n} $\end{document} with using the proposed method. The main idea of this method is that we can calibrate phase shifters one by one via two-dimensional (2D) scanning. For example, for N-cascaded phase shifter, the calibration of phase shifter N can be realized by calibrating the 2D scanning phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document} and the 2D scanning phase shifter N, and the calibration of phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document} can be achieved by calibrating the 2D scanning phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-2 $\end{document} and the 2D scanning phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document}, and so on. The 2D scanning phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document} and the 2D scanning phase shifter N scan the phase shifter N by m points and then the current of phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document} is changed to scan the phase shifter N. Whenever changing the current of phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document} once, we can plot a curve of current-transmission. The lowest point of the curve changes with the change of the current phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document}. When the lowest point of the curve takes a maximum value, that point is the 0 or π phase of phase shifter N. Similarly, when the lowest point of the curve takes a maximum value, that point is the \begin{document}$ -0.5{\rm{\pi }} $\end{document} or \begin{document}$ 0.5{\rm{\pi }} $\end{document} phase of phase shifter \begin{document}$ N-1 $\end{document}. Then we can calibrate all phase shifters by using this method, but each phase shifter has two possibilities. Then we can set a specific current of all phase shifters to finish the calibration. The different parameters are verified to see their effect on fidelity. It is found that small experimental error has little effect on fidelity. When \begin{document}$ m > 20 $\end{document}, the fidelity becomes approximately a constant. For every 1760 increase in N, the fidelity decreases by about 0.01%. The fidelity of 20-cascaded phase shifters is 99.8%. The splitting ratio of MMI may is not 50∶50 as designed because of chip processing errors. So, different splitting ratios are simulated and it is found that the splitting ratio affects the fidelity more seriously than other parameters. But our method works still well even when the splitting ratio is 45∶55, whose fidelity is 99.95% if we know the splitting ratio. The method will greatly expand the application scope of integrated quantum photonics."> - 必威体育下载

Search

Article

x

留言板

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

downloadPDF
Citation:

    Xing Ze-Yu, Li Zhi-Hao, Feng Tian-Feng, Zhou Xiao-Qi
    PDF
    HTML
    Get Citation
    Metrics
    • Abstract views:3414
    • PDF Downloads:86
    • Cited By:0
    Publishing process
    • Received Date:02 March 2021
    • Accepted Date:15 April 2021
    • Available Online:07 June 2021
    • Published Online:20 September 2021

      返回文章
      返回
        Baidu
        map