搜索

x

留言板

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

downloadPDF
引用本文:
Citation:

    姚军财, 申静

    Objective assessment of image quality based on image content contrast perception

    Yao Jun-Cai, Shen Jing
    PDF
    HTML
    导出引用
    • 为了提出性能优异的图像质量评价(IQA)模型, 本文基于人类视觉感知特性和图像的灰度梯度、局部对比度和清晰度特征, 提出了一种基于图像内容对比感知的IQA方法. 在该方法中, 首先结合视觉感知特性, 基于物理学中对比度定义, 提出一种图像质量定义及其值计算方法; 之后, 基于灰度梯度共生矩阵, 提出一种图像灰度梯度熵的概念及其值的计算方法, 并基于图像灰度梯度熵、局部对比度和清晰度, 提出一种图像内容及其视觉感知的描述方法; 最后, 基于图像内容特征和图像质量定义, 综合分析, 提出IQA方法及其数学模型. 并且采用5个开源图像数据库中的119幅参考图像和6395幅失真图像对其进行了仿真测试, 同时分析和探讨了52种失真类型对IQA的影响; 另外, 为了说明所提IQA模型的优势, 将其与现有的7个典型IQA模型, 从精度、复杂性和泛化性能上进行了对比分析. 实验结果表明, 所提IQA模型的精度PLCC值在5个数据库中最低可以实现0.8616, 最高可达到0.9622, 其性能综合效益优于7个现有IQA模型. 研究结果表明, 所提IQA方法是有效的、可行的, 所提IQA模型是一个性能优异的IQA模型.
      Image quality assessment (IQA) plays a very important role in acquiring, storing, transmitting and processing image and video. Using the characteristics of human visual perception and the features of the gray, gradient, local contrast, and blurring of image, an IQA method based on the image content contrast perception is proposed in the paper, which is called MPCC. In the proposed method, firstly, combining with the characteristics of human visual perception, based on the definition of the contrast in physics, a novel definition for image quality and its calculation method are proposed. Then, based on the gray gradient co-occurrence matrix, a novel concept, namely the gray-gradient entropy of image, and its calculation method, are proposed. And based on the gray-gradient entropy, local contrast and blurring of image, a method of describing the image content and their visual perception are proposed. Finally, based on the image content features and the image quality definition, an IQA method and its mathematical model are proposed by comprehensive analysis. Further, the proposed IQA model MPCC is tested by using 119 reference images and 6395 distorted images from the five open image databases (LIVE, CSIQ, TID2008, TID2013 and IVC). Moreover, the influences of the 52 distortion types on IQA are analyzed. In addition, in order to illustrate the advantages of the MPCC model, it is compared with the seven existing typical IQA models in terms of the accuracy, complexity and generalization performance of model. The experimental results show that the accuracy PLCC of the MPCC model can achieve 0.8616 at lowest and 0.9622 at most in the five databases; among the 52 distortion types, the two distortion types, namely the change of color saturation and the local block-wise distortions of different intensity, have the greatest influence on IQA, and the accuracy PLCC values of the seven existing IQA models are almost all below 0.6, but the PLCC of the MPCC model can reach more than 0.68; and the comprehensive benefit of the performance of the MPCC model is better than those of the seven existing IQA models. These results of test and comparison above show that the proposed IQA method is effective and feasible, and the corresponding model has an excellent performance.
          通信作者:姚军财,sxhzyjc@sina.com
        • 基金项目:国家级-人眼对比度敏感视觉特性的测量及其在图像压缩中的应用研究(61301237)
        [1]

        [2]

        [3]

        [4]

        [5]

        [6]

        [7]

        [8]

        [9]

        [10]

        [11]

        [12]

        [13]

        [14]

        [15]

        [16]

        [17]

        [18]

        [19]

        [20]

        [21]

        [22]

        [23]

        [24]

        [25]

        [26]

        [27]

        [28]

        [29]

        [30]

        [31]

      • 数据库 LIVE(779) CSIQ(866) TID2008(1700) TID2013(3000) 加权
        PLCC 0.9622 0.9586 0.8778 0.8616 0.8915
        SROCC 0.9660 0.9569 0.8831 0.8452 0.8854
        RMSE 7.4397 0.0747 0.6427 0.6293
        OR 0.1531 0.2690 0.1287 0.1198
        下载: 导出CSV

        数据库 参数 PSNR VSNR SSIM FSIMc VSI GMSD MAD MPCC
        CSIQ PLCC 0.8000 0.8002 0.8613 0.9192 0.9279 0.9541 0.9502 0.9587
        SROCC 0.8058 0.8106 0.8756 0.9310 0.9423 0.9570 0.9466 0.9569
        RMSE 0.1575 0.1575 0.1334 0.1034 0.0979 0.0786 0.0818 0.0748
        OR 0.4220 0.3832 0.3535 0.3041 0.2873 0.2742 0.2829 0.2738
        LIVE PLCC 0.8723 0.9231 0.9449 0.9613 0.9482 0.9603 0.9675 0.9620
        SROCC 0.8756 0.9274 0.9479 0.9645 0.9524 0.9603 0.9669 0.9660
        RMSE 13.3597 10.5059 8.9455 7.5296 8.6816 7.6214 6.9073 7.4598
        OR 0.2179 0.2151 0.1865 0.1627 0.1853 0.1643 0.1529 0.1606
        TID2013 PLCC 0.7062 0.7402 0.7895 0.8769 0.9000 0.8553 0.8267 0.8648
        SROCC 0.6917 0.7316 0.7417 0.8510 0.8965 0.8044 0.7807 0.8452
        RMSE 0.8887 0.8392 0.7608 0.5959 0.5404 0.6423 0.6975 0.6224
        OR 0.1636 0.1552 0.1427 0.1132 0.1045 0.1242 0.1323 0.1179
        下载: 导出CSV

        失真类别 PSNR VSNR SSIM FSIMc VSI GMSD MAD MPCC
        1 Additive Gaussian noise(AGN) 0.9552 0.8319 0.8685 0.9152 0.9527 0.9503 0.8897 0.8706
        2 Noise in color comp. (NCC) 0.9256 0.7814 0.8050 0.8873 0.9172 0.9118 0.8438 0.8324
        3 Spatially correl. noise (SCN) 0.9525 0.8105 0.8621 0.8989 0.9472 0.9391 0.9008 0.7457
        4 Masked noise (MN) 0.8707 0.7715 0.8219 0.8492 0.8203 0.7547 0.8009 0.6943
        5 High frequency noise (HFN) 0.9731 0.9061 0.9081 0.9475 0.9655 0.9567 0.9233 0.9090
        6 Impulse noise (IN) 0.8887 0.7442 0.7415 0.8171 0.8635 0.7572 0.3206 0.7408
        7 Quantization noise (QN) 0.8880 0.8384 0.8702 0.8794 0.8747 0.9110 0.8571 0.8122
        8 Gaussian blur (GB) 0.9169 0.9437 0.9634 0.9544 0.9551 0.9099 0.9357 0.9252
        9 Image denoising (ID) 0.9640 0.9463 0.9589 0.9652 0.9707 0.9759 0.9645 0.9594
        10 JPEG compression (JPEG) 0.9167 0.9386 0.9551 0.9754 0.9858 0.9843 0.9638 0.9509
        11 JPEG2000 compression (JPEG2 K) 0.9170 0.9513 0.9658 0.9754 0.9845 0.9812 0.9740 0.9452
        12 JPEG transm. errors (JPEG trans.) 0.8104 0.8597 0.9181 0.9176 0.9457 0.9079 0.9001 0.8805
        13 JPEG2000 transm. errors (JPEG2K trans) 0.9002 0.8435 0.8801 0.8929 0.9192 0.9085 0.8838 0.8699
        14 Non ecc. patt. noise (NEPN) 0.6746 0.6774 0.7773 0.8068 0.8162 0.8133 0.8608 0.8132
        15 Local block-wise dist. (LBWD) 0.2410 0.3632 0.6022 0.5542 0.4984 0.6520 0.4187 0.6845
        16 Mean shift (MS) 0.8056 0.5160 0.8019 0.7869 0.8021 0.7707 0.6934 0.7720
        17 Contrast change (CC) 0.5811 0.4251 0.6026 0.7266 0.6974 0.7111 0.3199 0.8108
        18 Change of color saturation (CSS) 0.3294 0.4184 0.4590 0.8228 0.8052 0.4234 0.2846 0.7583
        19 Multipl. Gauss. noise (MGN) 0.9204 0.7730 0.7896 0.8660 0.9136 0.8911 0.8529 0.8759
        20 Comfort noise (CN) 0.8702 0.9016 0.9022 0.9463 0.9546 0.9562 0.9444 0.8476
        21 Lossy compr. of noisy (LCN) 0.9429 0.8960 0.9174 0.9564 0.9636 0.9703 0.9562 0.7889
        22 Image color quant. w. dither (CQWD) 0.9308 0.8773 0.8619 0.8911 0.8963 0.9192 0.8779 0.8721
        23 Chromatic aberrations (CA) 0.9556 0.9592 0.9770 0.9794 0.9748 0.9737 0.9696 0.9473
        24 Sparse sampl. and reconstr. (SSR) 0.9296 0.9477 0.9667 0.9776 0.9808 0.9849 0.9766 0.9349
        Max 0.9731 0.9592 0.9770 0.9794 0.9858 0.9849 0.9766 0.9594
        Min 0.2410 0.3632 0.4590 0.5542 0.4984 0.4234 0.2846 0.6845
        波动范围宽度 0.7321 0.5959 0.5181 0.4252 0.4873 0.5614 0.6920 0.2750
        所有整体精度 0.7062 0.7402 0.7895 0.8769 0.9000 0.8553 0.8267 0.8648
        下载: 导出CSV
      • [1]

        [2]

        [3]

        [4]

        [5]

        [6]

        [7]

        [8]

        [9]

        [10]

        [11]

        [12]

        [13]

        [14]

        [15]

        [16]

        [17]

        [18]

        [19]

        [20]

        [21]

        [22]

        [23]

        [24]

        [25]

        [26]

        [27]

        [28]

        [29]

        [30]

        [31]

      • [1] 霍勇刚, 严江余, 张全虎.缪子多模态成像图像质量分析. 必威体育下载 , 2022, 71(2): 021401.doi:10.7498/aps.71.20211083
        [2] 霍勇刚, 严江余, 张全虎.缪子多模态成像图像质量分析. 必威体育下载 , 2021, (): .doi:10.7498/aps.70.20211083
        [3] 史晨阳, 林燕丹.基于图像色貌和梯度特征的图像质量客观评价. 必威体育下载 , 2020, 69(22): 228701.doi:10.7498/aps.69.20200753
        [4] 周博睿, 谈宜东, 沈学举, 朱开毅, 鲍丽萍.微泡造影剂增强超声调制激光回馈成像对比度的机理研究. 必威体育下载 , 2019, 68(21): 214304.doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190770
        [5] 吴元庆, 王洋, 张延涛, 张宇峰, 刘春梅.对比度阈值函数修正对于NVThermIP模型的影响. 必威体育下载 , 2018, 67(21): 210702.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180493
        [6] 范启蒙, 尹成友.高对比度目标的电磁逆散射超分辨成像. 必威体育下载 , 2018, 67(14): 144101.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180266
        [7] 姚军财, 刘贵忠.基于图像内容视觉感知的图像质量客观评价方法. 必威体育下载 , 2018, 67(10): 108702.doi:10.7498/aps.67.20180168
        [8] 周丽萍, 李培, 潘聪, 郭立, 丁志华, 李鹏.高灵敏、高对比度无标记三维光学微血管造影系统与脑科学应用研究. 必威体育下载 , 2016, 65(15): 154201.doi:10.7498/aps.65.154201
        [9] 田恒, 朱京平, 张云尧, 管今哥, 侯洵.浑浊介质中图像对比度与成像方式的关系. 必威体育下载 , 2016, 65(8): 084201.doi:10.7498/aps.65.084201
        [10] 侯旺, 梅风华, 陈国军, 邓喜文.基于背景最佳滤波尺度的红外图像复杂度评价准则. 必威体育下载 , 2015, 64(23): 234202.doi:10.7498/aps.64.234202
        [11] 鲁昌兵, 许鹏, 鲍杰, 王朝辉, 张凯, 任杰, 刘艳芬.快中子照相模拟分析与实验验证. 必威体育下载 , 2015, 64(19): 198702.doi:10.7498/aps.64.198702
        [12] 郑驰超, 彭虎, 韩志会.互相关自适应加权的医学超声成像算法研究. 必威体育下载 , 2014, 63(14): 148702.doi:10.7498/aps.63.148702
        [13] 宋洪胜, 庄桥, 刘桂媛, 秦希峰, 程传福.菲涅耳深区散斑强度统计特性及演化. 必威体育下载 , 2014, 63(9): 094201.doi:10.7498/aps.63.094201
        [14] 马原, 吕群波, 刘扬阳, 钱路路, 裴琳琳.基于主成分变换的图像稀疏度估计方法. 必威体育下载 , 2013, 62(20): 204202.doi:10.7498/aps.62.204202
        [15] 刘雪峰, 姚旭日, 李明飞, 俞文凯, 陈希浩, 孙志斌, 吴令安, 翟光杰.强度涨落在热光鬼成像中的作用. 必威体育下载 , 2013, 62(18): 184205.doi:10.7498/aps.62.184205
        [16] 常宏, 杨福桂, 董磊, 王安廷, 谢建平, 明海.激光光斑形状和尺寸对扫描显示中散斑对比度的影响. 必威体育下载 , 2010, 59(7): 4634-4639.doi:10.7498/aps.59.4634
        [17] 易煦农, 胡 巍, 罗海陆, 朱 静.用高阶对比度研究光束的小尺度自聚焦. 必威体育下载 , 2005, 54(2): 749-754.doi:10.7498/aps.54.749
        [18] 宋洪胜, 程传福, 张宁玉, 任晓荣, 滕树云, 徐至展.强散射体产生的像面散斑对比度与随机表面及成像系统关系的研究. 必威体育下载 , 2005, 54(2): 669-676.doi:10.7498/aps.54.669
        [19] 张 斌, 刘言军, 徐克璹.全息聚合物弥散液晶器件电光特性的研究. 必威体育下载 , 2004, 53(6): 1850-1855.doi:10.7498/aps.53.1850
        [20] 梁艳梅, 翟宏琛, 常胜江, 张思远.基于最大隶属度原则的彩色图像分割方法. 必威体育下载 , 2003, 52(11): 2655-2659.doi:10.7498/aps.52.2655
      计量
      • 文章访问数:8917
      • PDF下载量:154
      • 被引次数:0
      出版历程
      • 收稿日期:2020-03-04
      • 修回日期:2020-04-27
      • 上网日期:2020-05-08
      • 刊出日期:2020-07-20

        返回文章
        返回
          Baidu
          map